Debian vs arch for gaming. Stick with PopOS for the ease of use.

Debian vs arch for gaming So although I want to vote Debian here, I know i'm doing it for all the wrong reasons. I pickup SimplyMepis my first time. Debian provides a guided installation process, while Arch Linux requires manual intervention and a deeper understanding of Linux systems. Lastly, the documentation is not as good as Arch. So to answer your question, if nixOS is for newbies or mid-level users. I do play games on Debian stable and I suspect 99% of the time it won't make a difference what distro you're gaming on. When comparing Ubuntu vs Arch Linux, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Dec 20, 2023 · Hello, Linux enthusiasts! Welcome back to our channel. Not just limited to our forums (itsfoss. Distros like Mint, Ubuntu, Pop!_OS, and Debian are more about stability and ensuring that updates don’t cause bugs or break the system, however this can lead to software being a few versions behind the latest version while the devs run tests to ensure nothing will break etc. Arch on the other hand has no strong views and just allows you to configure system the way you like. Both boast dedicated communities, robust ecosystems, and a rich heritage. If you're an inexperienced Linux user, Manjaro is the way to go, as it is user friendly arch. Look into universal branch for Ubuntu. P. Sep 25, 2023 · At the heart of this expansive world, two distributions—Debian vs Arch—have carved unique, remarkable, yet distinct legacies. Arch does not have nearly the scope that Debian does built in. Also, I might be too comfortable with Arch which has led to my conclusion. A Debian vs Arch is easy for me to vote Arch in. Stick with PopOS for the ease of use. Debian is great on the server side and if you like the "it just works" OOTB on desktop side,not too much into gaming and using stuff like DXVK,newer NVIDIA drivers etc. In this comprehensive video, we'll be Dec 23, 2023 · Arch Linux and Fedora have different installation processes, with Fedora being easier for first-time users and Arch requiring more research and knowledge. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Ubuntu minimal and Ubuntu Server are unrelated and totally different. Aug 9, 2021 · Subscribe to the world's #1 PC gaming mag; Lawrence Yang, told us during our hands-on time with the Deck when we asked about the switch from Debian to Arch. Even more different than arch and debiangentoo is a source code based distro. Jan 17, 2023 · Debian and Ubuntu are two of the most popular Linux distros. Arch Linux running Minecraft Lunar Client has long load times (switching worlds, loading in servers etc. Arch is as stable as Debian for me. Debian has been always my number one and i have been always coming back to it after using *buntu based distros. I use Debian testing on my computer at work. arch: PROS: minimalist fast lots of packages (AUR) works ok with Nvidia here to stay cool logo kernel is whatever you want CONS: unstable( system update is Russian roulette) nothing "just works" or is made for you (tweaking is always required) gaming performance is unstable (sometimes games become slow for 0 reason) feels like its held together Aug 18, 2024 · 3. It's not really supported as a rolling release, so pretty much no effort is made to keep it in a good state. But because of that you have to update some packages manually since stability means that Debian lags a bit behind. and I would like to see Arch at least get to the final. Once you get past things like package managers and init systems, though, Linux is pretty much Linux these days. Fedora 34 and 33 might have older packages since they are older and arch is rolling release. For an easy introduction to arch world, comsider installing manjaro. That battle would be epic. Ubuntu has a nice mixture of up-to-date hardware support, without being bleeding edge like Arch which can throw some REAL roadblocks up for UN-familiar to Linux users - in some cases insurmountable roadblocks that cause re-installs or days of reading to resolve an issue that should never exist on a stable (or stable-er) system. Fedora supports more hardware architectures than Arch Linux, offering better hardware compatibility out of the box. Jul 3, 2024 · Debian vs Arch Linux: The Philosophies of Stability vs Cutting Edge. But, GE has done such a good job of pushing in all the patches and tweaks needed to make linux gaming painless, I just keep going back. Most coming from arch, manjaro, fedora, endeavouros or nobara. Debian vs Arch Linux: Comparing Key Differences 1: Installation Process. The reason for this is I think I will be able to learn more about how things work in Linux with Arch even though I'm going to spend many hours hating myself for With KDE Plasma there's a default shortcut for disabling the compositor, at least on X11 (Alt+Shift+F12), but I am not aware if there's something similar on Gnome. This is a lot of people claim fedora is easier, but compared to arch, fedora is not that much easier tbh, you have to set up dnf to not be hellish slow, install media codecs, enable dozens of repos and whatnot. I actually prefer Arch to Fedora, just because it's easy to push in an odd chunk of software not in the repos or stay up to date on stuff I use. You could try Debian SID/unstable which would be more like Arch in that updates get rolled out once they are ready, even if compatibility is not assured. So what I want to know is what these distros offer and why I should or shouldn’t use either distro. are we anti cheat yet A comprehensive and crowd-sourced list of games using anti-cheats and their compatibility with GNU/Linux or Wine/Proton. For example you definitely need either Debian testing or Debian stable with the Backport kernels to make things work with the GPU, drivers etc. Your lean package count in Arch is because Arch splits out packages & dependencies less than Debian does. If you buy a brand-new bleeding edge machine with the latest hardware Fedora and Arch should be able to take advantage of all it's capacity whilst Debian might not be able to because Debian Stable isn't running the current kernel. Your sources have things backwards. I know that there's an obvious difference in the rolling release/bleeding edge aspect of Arch vs the slow moving/stable ecosystem of Debian. com with gaming on linux as its topic, subpages: Wiki, FAQ. I personally like Debian because of its social contract, its operation ethics, the way they operate, and the way I manage the installation. I guess it’s relative to what you’re talking about, but Fedora 35 often has newer packages than arch. Debian is quite "slow to update" (a. Arch with kde plasma desktop and dolphin file manager and gamescope is the ideal gaming setup because that is what the steamdeck uses and so is the best supported in terms of both bugfixes as well as performance due to valve devs working on that combo of software configuration. Minimalism and the stability wins. If you like having the latest and shiniest features (for example, the latest release of your desktop environment) then Ubuntu and Fedora are ideal. Debian if you want to get spicy with headless Agree. I will say that it depends, since Ubuntu, Pop_OS and other distros based of Debian/Ubuntu will use different versions of kernel, mesa etc. Jan 12, 2024 · 👋 Welcome! 🎉 In this video, we’ll be comparing two popular Linux distributions, Arch Linux and Ubuntu 23. Now I'm happy. Ubuntu minimal just a lean minimal version if Ubuntu desktop. Mint runs everything great (some things better than Windows even). And Debian has the biggest as well as the best community. Mar 6, 2023 · Arch and Ubuntu are well-served with online resources offering information and advice. "Debian and Arch are supreme. Ubuntu is good to get started with, Manjaro if you insist on something arch based. It is on same level of ease-of-installation as ubuntu or Pop. . Fedora? I'm aware of Ubuntu having slightly older Kernel or Mesa than Pop, but I believe the differences shouldn't be too big (<5%), and still, those end up reaching Ubuntu too (or you can just pick a PPA). Debian has the most well written documentation out there. Jan 20, 2024 · Just a note here. Etc. Edit: Actually, Pop runs PPAs too! And the latest packages come from Debian. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Frequency of Updates: Distros update and different rates - from rolling distros like Arch and Open Suse to leading edge distros like Fedora to distros that update periodically (every six months) like Ubuntu and PoP_OS! to those that update every few years like Ubuntu LTS and Debian. May 16, 2020 · When comparing Arch Linux vs Pop!_OS, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Also, Wayland is not good for gaming because it forces Vsync on, and that adds input lag. That's a whole new world not available to binary distros (but of course also a whole new world hardly anyone needs ;)). The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Debian is just as customizable as Arch. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Ubuntu is ranked 23rd. Also, Debian (and therefore Ubuntu as well), has excellent documentation for their distro specific tool in the form of man pages (manpages. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Debian GNU/Linux is ranked 2nd. Ubuntu is a great all arounder distro with the largest community, largest There are several reasons to recommend Arch-based (or rolling) distros over Ubuntu, but the most important one is if someone has new hardware, because it almost certainly won't even work in Ubuntu at all, to where you won't even be able to install Ubuntu at all. It's great for gaming, and while it's a rolling release and is more up-to-date than Ubuntu and other fixed releases, the packages are delayed quite a bit vs other rolling releases, eg Arch, Endeavour, Tumbleweed, etc. Stability is not a problem. For the past 3 months while using reddit, I have helped more users migrate to Ubuntu for gaming than in the past 2 years. linux_gaming - Forum on reddit. Arch in a set of gaming benchmarks. Ubuntu 22. So as you prolly know, ive been wanting to switch to linux for gaming after seeing how garbage and slow windows 10 is, only problem is that i dont know wether to go with arch or debian. Manjaro is a good platform to learn how things are done in Mint is highly recommended for both users coming from Windows, as well as users coming from Ubuntu, but unhappy with Ubuntu's recent, rather dramatic interface changes. debian. Generally any distro is perfectly fine for gaming. Garuda is pretty close to Nobara in features if you want an Arch based gaming distro, its fully stocked software wise, but is a medium performer, but faster Jun 5, 2023 · Debian Vs Arch Linux 1. Debian is well-suited for new users and those looking for a robust and extensive package repository, while Arch is more suited for advanced Apr 13, 2024 · In the vast landscape of Linux distributions, two names stand out prominently: Arch and Debian. I personally love Debian, but only for SERVERS! I run Debian 11 LXC servers at 256MB RAM per instance. Linux Distro Comparison: Debian vs Fedora vs Arch. ) Debian 11 has no such issues whatsoever, and FPS remains relatively same with both the Distros To try, just install Lunar Client AppImage (or) install the AUR Package on Arch. You can also try out distros on live USB/CD or in virtual machines to find the right one for you. Fedora updates bi-annually, every 6 months, which means it is much more up to date. Just Arch is a quite a bit easier to install, especially if you want to go with an Arch-based distro like Manjaro or Archbang instead of vanilla Arch. The Debian/Ubuntu ecosystem is not known for having the most current packages. RHEL, Ubuntu, Fedora are of the devil. This is actually hilarious. Dec 21, 2024 · Compare Arch Linux vs Debian to find the best Linux distribution for your needs in terms of stability, performance, and ease of use. Using Ubuntu it just works. So I Arch is designed for users who desire a do-it-yourself approach, whereas Ubuntu provides a pre-configured system. Arch is designed for users who desire a do-it-yourself approach, whereas Ubuntu provides a preconfigured system. Fedora has gone all in on the latest Gnome packages, and Arch is known for being pretty bleeding edge in its package releases. Fedora is comparable to Ubuntu in terms of stability, and while not bleeding edge like Arch, tends to be not that far behind. As someone who uses Linux full time for well over a decade and arch for most of that, the current state of gaming outside of competitive online games is that 98% of the time it works. If you do a "normal" debian install you use software from the stable repository which is managed as stable release repository. If You look carefully, you'll see that in every aspect, they both are the extreme opposite Arch packages everything into one and Fedora splits the different components up. Apr 27, 2019 · Debian has a better philosohpy. One is pretty much predicated on using Gnome, the other lets you choose you DE. Debian is ideal for those who need a very stable system, either for development or fully managed dedicated server use, powered by great ease of use and a vast software repository Hello! Having used Debian on my old laptop before, I'm planning to install Debian Testing (or stable, havent decided yet) on my gaming rig. And that software is months (or years) more up to date on Arch, as well. PopOS is tailored for users and Debian is meant to be ultra stable which also means stale. When comparing Arch Linux vs Debian GNU/Linux, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Gentoo vs Arch however. Arch Linux, which are two popular Linux distributions, and inform you of their key differences so that when buying a Linux VPS, make the right choice between Debian and Arch Linux for your goals. In my pc I do studies, programming and gaming, so I went with Debian as my daily driver because it's more suitable for a workstation, BUT, if my only focus was gaming, I would definitly go with Arch, it performs better and feels more smooth on screen. -OR- If you want Arch-based, EndeavourOS. 19 years later I can grab any Linux distro and run with it. Looking at Linux distributions shows big differences between Debian, Fedora, and Arch. Reply reply Now from what I know, Debian is easier to use and is very stable at the expense of not being up to date, While Arch is harder to use and isn’t so stable but it has the latest tech. "So, Arch Linux, one of the main Debian Stable will basically stay in it's current form until Debian 13 which, iirc, would be ~2 years from now. The distro comes with an app called “Garuda Gamer” that helps users install all the necessary apps like Steam, Heroic, DXVK, Wine, etc in one click. Ubuntu users can turn to the Ask Ubuntu website and the Ubuntu Forums, and Arch users have the ArchWiki. I've been running fedora for the past 20 years with no major issues. Debian is great if you preference a stable, predictable, rock solid experience, or feel strongly about free software, Fedora is great if you like very up to date packages, and leading edge software selection but don't want the headaches or maintenance burden of Arch. Dec 1, 2023 · The three Linux operating systems ComputerBase benchmarked are Arch Linux, with several designed for gaming. Debian would probably not be the best fit for gaming, du to the requirement for frequent updates to Mesa and Vulcan libs, and of course gpu drivers. It was base on Debian Stable and it's default DE was KDE. fedora is a good in-between answer here. I heard Debian is cool but bloated. Fedora also happens to be a testbed for RHEL, so it tends to be amongst the first to establish or switch to new standards, like BTRFS or Wayland. VS "Arch Linux" 64 bit but i definitely recommend a very up to date distro for gaming, and arch is literally the most up to date there Ubuntu vs Fedora vs Arch distro selection 'How Steam Play/Proton makes Gaming on Linux awesome' - talk by Thomas Crider aka GloriousEggroll (Proton-GE, Nobara Same here, run Debian on all my headless servers and routers, tried almost all the distro's, but that was many years ago. Now if you got to this point of the text then I want to ask you why would you use a Debian based distribution over something like Solus or Arch-Based for Gaming/Desktop use? I would like to know as I never got the appeal of Debian for Desktop or Gaming use especially when I started off, it felt very restrictive. Arch may be snappier due to binaries being riced more for performance than Debian. For pure gaming, I'd recommend Ubuntu (non-LTS) or Fedora. I'm not sure how I would vote. Derivative distros are pointless. So you can install the exact same stuff and arch will have 1000 packages and fedora will have 3000 packages, but fedora actually has less stuff installed because it hasn’t included some of the stuff Arch includes in its packages. Before publishing this article, I asked for suggestions for favorite Linux distributions for gaming. I really like Arch and Debian, they are by far my favorite distros out there. The ArchWiki is without doubt one of the premier sources of Linux information available today. “Better” is completely subjective. Arch is great, but it gives a new user too much room to screw up. PopOS comes pre installed with lots of gaming packages. What Arch teaches you is (1) how to install Arch, (2) how to cope with problems in AUR that is maintained by amateurs in their free time and does not track the base Arch changes, and (3) how to cope with the many programs available as Debian package that are not in AUR. If I pick up Arch or Debian vanilla back in 2003. In this video, we will pit Debian 12 vs. Play with arch in a VM. PPAs are an Ubuntu feature. But there are a couple cases in which a more up to date Mesa version or something might benefit you. But honestly, for gaming, something like Pop!_OS, Manjaro or even Ubuntu would be a better choice due to access to newer drivers and kernels. Out of the box, it comes only with free software and there is a strong stance against proprietary software. besides, fedora is not meant to be used as a desktop operating system. Maybe 5-10% of those you might need to mess around with proton/wine versions for a couple minutes, but it's so much easier than it was just half a decade ago. And with the plethora of offshoots that are merely GUI installer and some packaging + couple tools to make life easier it's not hard to be on Arch anymore, either, further that the pace of development for gaming on Linux outstrips that of non rolling and backports don't happen nearly often or fast enough, so for gaming generally find Arch to be the most reliable results and stability. Help please? It's not hardware-specific, but unless you have a decent amount of prior experience with Linux, don't use vanilla Arch. Feb 1, 2024 · Back to the original question: The “gaming focused” distros have always been more snakeoil then anything else. I am tempted to try Arch, to see what all the hub bub is about, and how well it can be a viable server, but when I hear updates can br Steam runs fine on Debian. They are quite close to vanilla arch but they include some minor addons to make your life easier installing/maintaining your arch installation. 3 LTS 64 bit. : Ubuntu is also nice but, since it's a corporate distro, it's not my first choice. Arch will be tough, especially post install configuration. The debian testing repository is a rolling release repository where new packages get added once they are deemed "useable" enough. community) but also some Reddit threads pointed at Kubuntu as their preferred choice because users feel the KDE desktop environment is a lightweight option to improve the gaming experience. If you're playing AAA games with kernel-level anticheat or if you just want the confidence that all games will work out of the box, it's best to stick with Windows. Sep 28, 2023 · Drauger OS describes itself as a Linux Desktop Gaming OS. Switched over to Fedora Workstation this week and absolutely love it. There’s nothing inherently wrong with an experienced user using Ubuntu or a novice user using Arch. Try out several distros, see what you like, stick with it, or switch again just for fun. The nVidia gpu might be a problem as I know it's disliked in this community. Both of them are equal for me but selected Arch as I'm using Same here. Don't get me wrong - even as a Debian user I often use the Arch wiki, but it's not for beginners, and most of it works for every distro. Some distros make being user friendly for new and casual users a priority. It wasn't hard to go beyond that. We’ll explore everything and help you learn everything you need to know about Debian vs Ubuntu. Another weird issue I noticed is that using xfce either on debian based or Arch based, on Debian based I set my middle monitor as the primary display, yet if I played games and/or ran phoronix test GPU tests that are in fullscreen, it always goes to the left monitor whereas on Arch based it goes into the middle screen. How does the package management system difference between Arch Linux and Debian? Arch Linux uses Pacman and the AUR for package management, focusing on simplicity and cutting-edge software. I don't mind a longer install of arch, especially with that documentation which is apparently perfect, but I am not sure if I should pick it as I heard arch has a tendency of shitting itself if you don't update it frequently. Its an option the user is given during installation. the arch playground is pretty fun to play with. Debian has one of the largest built-in package repositories of any distribution, and the few things that aren't in Debian's repos are usually still packaged for Debian by their publishers. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Arch Linux is ranked 1st while Pop!_OS is ranked 16th. Arch based is the future of gaming on Linux. They are used for different purposes, for different use cases, and by different users. Arch has wayyyyyyy more software than Mint, and especially when it comes to gaming. a. I don’t know how Pop controls releases, but likely is a downstream directly from the Debian project. I guess things like those happen with almost every distro and is pretty rare. Oct 5, 2018 · Ubuntu and Arch Linux couldn't be more different from each other. Welcome to the largest community for Microsoft Windows 10, the world's most popular computer operating system! This is not a tech support subreddit, use r/WindowsHelp or r/TechSupport to get help with your PC Like how Ubuntu packages their distro on top of Debian, Manjaro is based on Arch but packages their distro independent of Arch. The only other comparable documentation I found was gentoo. I find Void a nice balance. So for me personally, Arch is more stable and easier to maintain than Debian. Arch presents a simpler design from the base installation onward, relying on the user to customize it to their own specific needs. Updates often enough and haven't encountered any breakages so far. After 3 weeks with Debian I am back to Arch. Arch and arch based distros are number one and two on steam hw survey now And those don't include the steam deck. You'll immediately understand what I mean. , but if you plan to use for example Bottles or Steam Flatpak, then it doesn't matter since flatpak uses their on version of drivers, so you could care only about kernel, and to my knowledge you don't want to use Debian since it uses kernel 6. While both distributions offer unique benefits, they cater to different types of users with varying priorities. So far for me, fedora has been a good fit. at the end of the day its not archs fault, its actually still a good choice if you dont have some random hardware that companies are ass about it, lenovo has 0 support for linux, you cant even update your bios via linux, i have a seperate nvme that i connect externally which has a Arch is in many ways more streamlined and less "technically complex" than Debian: its package management tools are less complex and it's easier to create new packages for Arch, and default config files in Arch are more close to the upstream defaults than in Debian which customizes some configs heavily (of course often with good intention/reason Dec 18, 2023 · Much like Arch, Garuda is a rolling release, and besides the gaming goodies, most people like the way it looks. 1 and Intel ARC Arch is the best distribution for gaming there is. However instead of opting for the kernel from Ubuntu, Drauger uses the mainline Linux kernel. CTT seems to have a lot of influence these days. In my experience, Arch is about as stable as Debian sid, and that's OK. But for a newcomer or even I've seen Ubuntu break beyond repair during release upgrade, but I am still waiting for my Arch installation to break ;) There is also RHEL family with Fedora being a good choice. " People are going to have their opinions, and you don't have to follow them. Arch and Arch based distros have more recent software, than Debian and distros based on that. 10, to help you decide which one is the best fit f What I would personally do is just install Arch, Debian unstable, Fedora, or Gentoo, install all the stuff I need for gaming and other tasks I need to do on a daily basis, and call it a day. And it is called testing but it is more stable than most linux distros out there already. Their emphasis is on testing and stability. Im extremely familiar with both as ive been using linux for other stuff for 7 years. openSUSE vs. I've used well-known alternatives for gaming like Manjaro and Solus in the past, but decided not to go with them because Manjaro wasn't as stable as I like, and I'm scared of Solus being discontinued lol. People claim its less stable than ubuntu, but my experience has been otherwise, particularly because i had modified my ubuntu install a lot to fit my needs. Mint provides an updated interface with a look and feel similar to Gnome 2, with an application menu reminiscent of the Windows 7 Start Menu, with categorization and search. In your case Arch looks like the correct decision. When comparing Debian GNU/Linux vs Arch Linux, the Slant community recommends Arch Linux for most people. Debian is also incredibly stable which is a big selling point. Debian Linux and Arch Linux are two popular Linux distributions that embody contrasting philosophies when it comes to stability and cutting-edge software. expect breakage. But if you do not like Debian's choices, it will take you a lot of time and effort to "fight against Debian". Yes it's a little bloaty and the dir Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. I would like to make three category of issues with the distros I tried: Ubuntu based: But still Debian is great and so is Arch Linux,only Arch Linux is more suitable if you are into gaming/multimedia/new packages and know what you want from your system. Ubuntu's solid, MX too. Arch vs Debian 12 with Flatpak . Both Debian and Arch Linux are popular choices that offer unique advantages. Between the distros you selected, Debian is a bit similar to Ubuntu LTS (with the longer release schedule) and Fedora feels similar to non-LTS Ubuntu (with a new version every 6 months). Jul 8, 2023 · Debian and Arch Linux are the subject of our article; in this article, we decide to examine Debian vs. I wouldn't say it's bad but arch's wiki has ruined me. Debian tends to be smaller, lighter & more modular ime. Regular Arch, Regular Fedora, Nobara, and Debian Sid are the only distros I would consider for gaming. I don't thing I would of got to far. Debian, the base distribution for Ubuntu, has a philosohpy I agree with. You can influence how the packages for your system are built. # Example command to start Arch Linux installer sudo pacman -S arch-install-scripts Package Management Debian's APT. " But if you don't put The reason why a lot of people use Arch over Debian Testing is probably just popularity, since Arch is widely regarded as THE bleeding edge distro, and Debian is seen as the exact opposite, plus Arch gives you bragging rights, which might make it a more attractive option, given that the objective benefits are nearly identical, save for stability. Edit: to clarify, it depends on the package and the version you’re talking about. I'm still daily driving arch for new packages but if I were to choose I would choose ubuntu for stable gaming. PoP!_OS is a Ubuntu-based operating system built by System76 that features Steam Nah, probably closer to Arch's testing branch. they are making sure that the packages are rock solid, granite hard, diamond polish stable); you'd find Linux Mint's packages to be more updated compared to Debian. If you want your system for music, web browsing, video consumption, school work, and very light gaming pick mint. Debian uses APT, which is robust and stable with a vast repository. About a year or 2 ago i've decided to try Arch as have been sick of the ppa's. Gaming on arch is possible but as you said is not have same popularity than ubuntu and derivates distributions and this make easy find information or tools for many problems (example: ppa and other things) May 29, 2023 · The Arch Linux community is also very active, but it tends to cater more to advanced users who prefer a do-it-yourself approach. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: In which case It would be debian testing vs fedora, but not sure if any "known" debian based linux distro is basing itself on that branch. A reasonably computer literate friend has run Ubuntu, Debian and Fedora as his daily drivers, but when a package he wants isn't available, he usually gives up. Debian uses the APT (Advanced Package Tool) for package management. One is essentially static, from one release to the next, while one is rolling. Realized I was now tactically voting and so stopped myself. PopOS is built on top of Ubuntu, which is built on top of Debian. S. Ease of Installation: Arch with Wiki is probably a better experience than Debian (Debian being the Distribution Linus Thorvalds didn't install because of the installer) Arch is Rolling only, Debian has both stable and rolling models (currently, buster is stable, testing/bullseye and unstable/sid are rolling) Repositories: Debian has a large amount of software in its repositories, however only Holoiso is the fastest arch based distro for gaming with cachyos coming in a close second, but since holoiso is using the steamOS 3 interface I would not recomend it with an Nvidia card. In the past I always had issues with Debian and Arch based systems. I've also run PopOS on a 4GB chromebook without problems either. Some games run rather poorly with the compositor enabled, and/or aren't able to trigger the OS to automatically disable it in full-screen, so it can be useful to have a shortcut to manually control it. If you've spent a few months using Linux before, then go for it, but otherwise I don't know who told you to do it but don't. Arch's strength are up to date packages and ease of installing 3rd party software. Today, we're diving deep into the world of Linux distributions. A subreddit for discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). It's accessed by users of all distributions, not just Arch. There is nothing wrong with Ubuntu, per se, I just prefer newer packages and I dislike the non-LTS Ubuntu releases. Debian actually maintains three software repositories, stable, unstable and testing. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. And with minimal effort you xan solve all common issues for gaming. Debian testing might suffice, but as the name suggests, stuff could break temporarily. it's the test zone for red hat where they test Fedora and Arch have the latest kernels, that's all. Different distros have different purposes. If you have other usecases that make Debian appealing, then perhaps it's worth it for you. My personal recommendations are Fedora Workstation or Nobara (Nobara is Fedora but with gaming optimizations OOTB, maintained by GloriousEggroll). If you use the Debian repository to install Steam, you need to configure dpkg to include i386 versions of the graphics libraries since Steam needs them (or install Nvidia proprietary drivers 64/32 bit if using an Nvidia GPU). For personal use, you want either testing or sid. As for the "rebooting is a Gnome thing", The article I linked on the other reply says offline updates were introduced in Gnome software back in 2012 and recently in KDE discover (2021). (Crashes broken patches etc. However, it can get behind version-wise. Philosophy. k. Arch: rolling release distro; Fedora: rolling, but a bit slower • Both have custom packages (AUR in Arch, COPR in Fedora) • Arch will be less stable because packages are released immediately without testing • Arch has a huge AUR packages library • Fedora is much more stable and reliable than Arch • Better performance in Arch compared to Fedora (and Nobara 💩) Has anyone found any significant performance differnece between Pop vs Ubuntu or, let's say Nobara vs. most Linux tutorials online are based on Ubuntu so in that regard it’s far easier to put something on ubuntu but arch is more customizable so in theory I can set up my arch install to be identical to ubuntu and thus install the same software (snap etc) The main reason I jumped from Ubuntu to Majaro was for gaming, Ubuntu ends up way too far behind when it comes to the Kernel version and compiling things is a nightmare when 64bit and 32bit libs come into play. If you want a easy starting point with arch, I would advice to use EndeavourOS. It's my favourite Linux distro by far. They both have similarities and differences that we’ll compare in this article. Linux Debian vs Fedora vs Arch Debian vs Arch. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. And for the latest software, Flatpak or the AUR is a good option. APT is known for its reliability and ease of use. It sounds like you're not too experienced with Linux. I don't need some one size fits all pre-configured distro, because there really is no such thing as one size fits all solution. ) Fedora has its own "flavor" of issues but never had a situation when my notebook was not able to boot in and continue with the work. 4. more stable than arch, relatively speaking, and still leading edge and more up-to-date than debian. Arch and debian are at least both binary distros so some comparing is possible. All tests were performed on the same hardware. Clear Linux For Intel Steam Gaming Performance https: If you are on Arch (based) you can try adding Valve's repo and installing Nov 30, 2024 · For a more detailed comparison of Ubuntu and Fedora, check out our post on Ubuntu vs Fedora. With a vast repository of software, Debian users can easily install, update, and remove packages using simple In theory yes, but if you want to use Debian for gaming, SID would be the better option rather than 12. This will include speed speed testing on two di Nov 1, 2023 · 3. Ubuntu LTS will be fine for gaming. Use an Arch or Ubuntu derivative, but not vanilla Arch. Windows vs Linux! Full speed test on benchmarking of Windows 10, Debian, and a Arch based Linux distribution. The table below highlights the important differences between the 2 distros If you are bored and want to see things crash and burn go with arch. Linux Gaming Guide - Compilation of different techniques for optimizing the Linux gaming experience. Jan 2, 2024 · Ubuntu vs Arch Linux Comparison for Performance, Gamers and Programmers Who is it really for If we talk about Arch Linux then it provides users who wish to customize different elements of their OS such as customizing the desktop and much more with more of a Do-it-Yourself (DIY) experience. He had some bad run ins with compiling from scratch and takes the 4 or so bad cases vs the 25 or so good ones and just doesn't try. One is Debian/Ubuntu-based, one isn't. Ubuntu vs. I use plain Arch (not Manjaro or Endeavor), and yeah, getting everything installed properly was a pain, and you're going to run into issues every now and then that you were apparently missing some package that you would think would have been included in the pre instal. Feb 14, 2024 · Forums, wikis, and social media for distros like Ubuntu and Arch Linux offer great support. There will be missing or disagreement between packages if you install Manjaro; arch-wiki-doc, an offline arch wiki document, is not available from Manjaro. IF you know what you're doing, and you're willing to put in the time, Arch can be leaner and faster and be wholly "up to date. if i wanted out of the box experience and easy maintenance, i'd use ubuntu. With up-to-date software, the performance of Arch Linux is consistently top-notch, making it more suitable for gaming. Performance in games is largely down to 3 things: The GPU driver version (and by extension the Kernel version), the Mesa version, and the Wine/Proton/DXVK Version, all of which can be upgraded anytime or in the case of Fedora are fairly up to date anyway. Debian tries hard not to break compatibility, and will have long debates over changing core features of the OS, where Arch kind of takes a newest version no matter what policy, leaving people who need older versions of a package for compatibility to use 3rd party repos or the AUR, while on Debian there's generally a libxxxx-compat package created. Kubuntu. Mar 31, 2023 · Choosing the right Linux distribution can be a challenging task, and the choice between Debian and Arch Linux is no exception. I have worries that it hasn’t all the apps because it’s based on Arch and not Ubuntu. Our exploration delves deep into the Debian and Arch debate, shedding light on their histories, strengths, and weaknesses. Stability vs Rolling Release: Debian’s stable release provides long-term stability, while Arch’s rolling release model offers continuous updates and the latest software. I love rolling releases, but I just don't think Debian is the right choice there. I do hope his work gets mainlined into distros. Personally, I use openSUSE Tumbleweed, but Arch is also a good choice, but I haven't seen a solid Debian-based one. Arch Linux has a faster package manager called Pacman, while Fedora uses DNF. If you select minimal you get Ubuntu Desktop but basically start out with Just a web browser and the system Utilities. 04. Debian can use them, but it’s not the typical route for software support. Arch packages are extremely easy to make and extremely easy to distribute via the AUR. The distro is based off Ubuntu LTS releases. org is great btw, also for Arch users). I had lots of problems with arch compared to debian and ubuntu. I'd say yes, if you want it. I have VMs with arch and debian as my playground. Fedora vs. Playing on Linux is still work in progress and you want regular updates, the newest kernel, and so on. Whichever one of these you pick, it will work very well for gaming provided you know how to setup everything. I'm an ex-Windows user who has been using Linux for about 4 years (switched because of a partitioning mistake). Is Arch Linux more secure than Debian? Security depends on configuration and Arch often doesn’t have newer packages. Many people start with Ubuntu and switch to Arch, but that is not the only way to learn linux. I ran the Arch benchmarks first, Nov 30, 2024 · We will explore Debian vs Arch for gaming, debian vs arch minecraft including a comparison of how each handles popular titles like Minecraft, as well as examining Debian vs Arch performance across various tasks. Sep 17, 2020 · The main difference between Debian and Pop!_OS is Debian is meant for users who are looking for a stable distro that has the best software and hardware support while Pop!_OS is meant for users who need a Ubuntu-based gaming distro. I prefer openSUSE Tumbleweed for rolling release and Fedora for a shorter cycle regular release, other than Arch, those two are the best distros for gaming and most things in my opinion. Debian Stable is great for getting things done without a great amount of fuss - you configure things once and they don't change out from under you. The only use for Debian stable is on a production server IMO. Now as far as Debian based distributions versus Arch based distributions are concerned, we must look at the reasons that almost half of all other Linux distributions are based on Debian. Debian vs Arch I'm going to be putting a Linux partition on my hard drive soon, the other partition will be windows, and have been thinking about being all insane and going with Arch. Maybe you can try out this one instead? Fedora ships with more recent packages than typical Debian based systems, while still following a "stable" release model. There's plenty other distros that can do all the same with less headache and a larger community. Oct 12, 2024 · Ultimately, everything will boil down to what you expect from your Linux system, your preference, and your experience level when deciding between Debian vs Arch Linux. It's essentially vanilla arch with a graphical installer. The same cannot be said of most mainstream Debian based distros I've seen. Many Arch users have started on Ubuntu and eventually migrated to Arch. xzqczdo zxn gipx knsx asvdgs upwobx otiorcu codmq yboyz eoypqf