Remux vs 4k. Your mileage may vary though.
Remux vs 4k FGT plagiarizes from other groups and adds unnecessary tracks. thumb drive with a remux file in it, any picture quality difference? Question Let’s say I have a 2tb hard drive with a 4k remux movie file. The answer to this question is subjective. And yes, BT. mkv). WiLDCAT also has made a few HDR fan restorations of individual films. Hybrid remux mean multiple sources were used, it does not have to mean hdr + dv. 43:1 digital 4K IMAX movies. I have "40 LED Full HD tv. 78:1 (16:9) in IMAX. File size is another factor to consider when choosing between Remux and UHD. File Size. Plex can play 4K remixes no problem but they really screwed something up with the latest updates. com) basically recommends bitrates of 20 Mbps or higher to get better than streaming quality but I've found that a lot of streaming movie content is at this level or slightly higher now. Step 1 is to not download the 4k light junk in your first example. My own video camera is a 4k and is 1gb per minute recording. An icon Best 4K REMUX Release Groups? Question I have recently been getting into remux content and was just wondering if there are certain release groups that do Remux releases better than others? or if most releases generally give the same picture quality within a high enough bitrate/file size? I see "GHD" a lot and also "FraMeSToR" quite frequently. However they made a number of mistakes early on when Question on REMUX vs x265 Codec . REMUX. this is just my personal opinions. This preservation of quality is particularly important for high-resolution videos, such as 4K or HDR content, where even minor compression artifacts can be noticeable. com has reviews up 4K WEB-DL vs 4K Remux . Reply reply Thesoyeedg • Remux and high bitrate encodes are better if you don't care about HDR or DoVi. Reply reply RyuIzanagi Some extra info about 4K/X265. A lot of movies aren't real 4k. Your mileage may vary though. Hi I currently have a server with around 20TB storage and want to upgrade some of my movies to 4K but want the quality to be great, I have a 55 inch 4K samsung tv and usually sit about Uncompressed remux with all original audio and subtitle optionsIf you have any questions please PM me on Discord: kamezx. Now if I update Plex again it goes back to the buffering issues. UHD if you have a decent 4K TV w/ HDR. An example I saw today was Handmaid’s Tale, all 3 seasons are on blu rays but also available as a 4k webrip. Godzilla vs Kong: 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10+ BluRay rip 5,39 GB? Question I have a Samsung QN90A Neo Qled 55 Inch and can only display HDR 10 and HDR 10+. 2020 is HDR. Question Hello guys, I just bought my first 4K TV (LG OLED65C9) and I want to start getting some 4K movies. A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. The video quality looks the same. on the other hand, the smaller 265/264 files appear to be smoothing Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. 4k, transcoding, and you - aka the rules of 4k - a FAQ - Plex. 2014. As you know, Christopher Nolan is known for demanding the best out of his work visually. I want to know if the difference between a remux file and a rip is You have to remux your rips but you can maintain full quality when doing that. An icon I think hdr is the key to quality and makes even an encode worth watching over a 1080p remux. You just have to check the file size. 120g, 90. Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. Subreddit for all things 4K Blu-ray, reviews, tech and hardware. Reply reply Bought my first 4K TV set with Dolby Vision and HDR. 480p>720p>1080p>2160p(4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. Framestor is a remux group so those would be pretty high file sizes, around 40-100 gb. Most 4K is upscaled (especially when cgi heavy) from the source anyway so its really the hdr that adds the deep color and contrast to make the pq look far superior to the sdr when done right. Not many IMAX theaters can show 1. I did comparing tests with Remux, HDB internals, scene encodes and 5,6,7 GB 1080p HEVC encodes and all looks the same regarding to video quallity. If storage space is a concern then you should probably skip remuxes and grab encodes. Compared to the Blu-ray, there was almost no film grain and the people looked really smooth and waxy. Is it worth los remux son los que mas pesan de los 3 y el que mas calidad tiene de los 3. 1080p remux vs 2160p blu ray . So for the storage space dropping from 170GB down to closer to 20GB in 4K with little to no noticeable difference, it’s a no from me. Choose a movie which is native 4k. TERMiNAL does some good work with releasing UHD HDR HEVC encodes around 20gb, which I find preferable to even BluRay Remux's. For me its because of his encode quality vs the size. Will the quality look exactly the same compared to a 4k disc being played on We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. He/she/it does 4K and RM4K and 1080p and everything always in HEVC x265. Reply reply [deleted] • Yeah, I find some 1080p content have vibrant colors. Maybe all these companies use special software to make the file size smaller without losing quality. The biggest difference would be seen between webdl and the remux as the webdl almost certainly doesn't have enough bitrate. Some torrented files are full 4K Bluray quality, others are compressed down. 1080p. That's not a remux, but is an encode. MA. The full bluray contains a number of different directories and video containers, each containing different different types of videos depending on the bluray, including extras such as cast Searching for: 2160p uhd bluray remux in: Movies Movies Only TV Only Games Only Music Only Applications Only Documentaries Only Anime Only Other Only XXX Only Sorted by Size Desc. A. v) mọi lúc, mọi nơi, tương thích trên mọi thiết bị. A multiplex is a stream or file that has multiple other files or streams contained within it. 43:1 for about 70 min. They tend to be rather speedy as well. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. For example I watched thor ragnarok from a lossless remux vs his encode (just testing) on a 55 4k tv and honestly at where i was setting i couldn't Hi, im thinking of upgrading some of my downloaded movies to 4k and im wondering if i should go for the remux versions or the encoded versions? im seeing remux versions at 50-70GB and other options there for 15-25GB and i dont want to be able to notice a dip in quality and the hdr being off especially if im upgrading to 4k for the better quality and hdr. 50 4k remux hdr movies run smoothly in kodi on my lg oled c1. Your second example with the low bitrate is also not a remux. For media, an example is taking discrete video and audio sources and multiplexing them into one output (ie. I’m finding more and more shows stream in 4k but are only released physically as a 1080p blu rays. Richard. With the roku only having a 10/100 port, i know the remux bitrate can sometimes go over 100mb and cause issues. EDIT: I know they both have 4K releases but 4K took longer to be available and its not consistent yet, some movies have no 4k release, I dont have a 4K display yet so I can't compare it on my own. 1-FGT If you have a Roku TV and your streaming from a Plex app don't bother with 4K remux Dithered down web rips = cheap TV, sound bar setup Common setup but not meant for 4k viewing 4K remux = quality TV, hardwired network Just wanted to get people's views on 4K vs 1080p on weather its worth it downloading/ripping 4K media based on the fact there double the size and the majority of releases are not True 4K, though you do get HDR? I Remux everything for 1080P and get 4K releases also when available. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. I watch on an OLED as well in a home theater setup. "Dune" is 1. Very small sample size though. I’d advise getting the remux, but if you’re looking for the absolute highest quality version of Apocalypse Now you might have better luck looking for the 200gb dcp remux or 1 tb 4k prores i have a chromecast google tv with ethernet rj45 hub. Cosmos. Blu-ray. Is there a loss in pixel density in encodes compared to remux? Both look the same. Media: Kaleidescape Strato V, Zidoo Z30 Pro , Apple TV 4k Featuring OCA Evo Neuron optimization! Reactions: apelbaum. Only difference should be the amount of audio and subtitle tracks. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. Though if you plan to upgrade to a 4K set one day, you can go with the 2160p file. The difference between that and Netflix streaming or even ITunes digital movies, was considerable to me. Even with that much space, I don’t personally see a difference. AVC. I've been lurking in r/plex, r/hometheater, and r/homelab for a while, and I am looking for advice and resource recommendations on building a Plex setup that will give me 4k, HDR, super-saiyan, lossless or near-loss quality streams, possibly with the option to transcode down for remote users. It wouldn't need to be upscaled but the quality will still be low quality (meaning that each 2x2 pixel set won't be as accurate as an upscaled HQ 1080p image). The 1080p version is de-noised to high hell to look like Futurama or My comment wasnt about remux vs encodes, it was about remux vs every other form of video files. I also I dint mention it to them I also hid which of the files was the remux vs the encode. 20TB storage server/ 4K Remux vs 4K Encode . So, unless you are specifically looking at Xbox for gaming more than A 4K file at low quality will have less information than the 1080p copy. At least with my video setup. Can people really tell the difference between a 25 gb digital movie and the same film remux at 50gb+? There is no correct answer. tv. They usually have HDR and better sound tracks like Atmos 1080p is the resolution. Question I'm looking at 2 files, one of them is a REMUX which is 140GB and the other is x265 less than 10GB. They look pretty much the same. All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. Remux files are typically larger in size compared to UHD files due to their uncompressed nature. - x264 1080p Blu-ray Remux - x265 4K web-DL I guess the BEST source in my use case will be the Remux for obvious reasons. The difference between 192 kbps low-quality AC3, 640 kbps EAC-3, and DTS-HD/TrueHD encodes is very obvious to me. New comments Now that I have a 4K TV, there more options, so I don't know what to do. But it's still worth downloading the 4k version for the HDR. 43:1 (either 70mm film or 4K IMAX with Laser). a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been reencoded. Skip to main content. I generally want my TV shows and movies to be around 8 mbps or so. The difference will vary between the movies (as expected). However, the reason I am asking this question again on this sub, is because I am specifically interested in whether the difference would be For future better keep the 4k hdr remux. I don't notice much of a difference between 25gb 4k compressed or remux copies. Don't do 4K yet. Checking dark frames, and motion frames too and don't see a difference in detail. DLSS ultra perf 4K vs performance for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. i could be wrong , what is your thought ? I can't even see the difference from 4K remux and 1080p remux on a 65 inch sitting from my couch. Reply reply EvanVanVan • • Honestly, I can't. I have a bunch of 25-50GB 4K movies, but only selected ones I want it great quality. What's everyone's preference for content where a 4K REMUX isn't available because it was never released for that particular item. Odyssey. and 1. Just buy a bigger HDD and Video quality can also impact your ability to see the difference between 4K and 1080p. 90:1 for about 85 min. Watching tv from 2-2,5 m distance in my room. Top 2 are made from the bottom one, what you think? Unless the source has some problems like dirty pixels and banding, and the encoder fixes them, the remux is always best. No my comment is not directly about the difference in quality. I would like to build a server with ~50 TB of RAID storage to handle this with whatever There is no single answer to whether or not someone will notice the quality difference between a disc and a streaming service. Download encode and remux and find out if you can tell the difference. a high quality encode. Who know you probably getting a hdr hardware in the future and dont have to redownlod the 4k hdr remux again. I’d Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type to collect for what type of movies? Which ones benefit most from this higher bitrate + lossless audio? I have a 4TB hard drive that I just filled up with a bunch of Tigole's 4k HDR HEVC files since all his bluray rips were so good (and those included commentaries and extras). 39:1 aspect ratio, The 4k REMUX is better, you can see the grain of the paper they drew the cartoon on!!! Look at the curtain and the insane amounts of detail in the colour gradient. DTS And I cannot detect a difference either on my LG 77" CX OLED or 140" JVC 4K projector (or my 4K computer display for that matter) even when standing up close to the screen swapping back and forth really quick between the Remux and encode and pixel peeping. Is the difference in quality really worth it? But their remux standards are the highest. My question was more for the shows/ movies that don’t have that. The remuxes have extreme noise that’s really distracting and actually discards some of the depth information of the scene. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. While both could probably play the 4K remux equally well, the Shield is just so much easier to use and also super versatile in what you could use it for. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. true. It becomes a personal preference as to whether you want a rip of disks with menus or not. Theres examples of live action movies where the web copy is superior to the bluray for one reason or another. Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. It was finished as a 2K Digital Intermediate at the 2. 5K using Arri Alexa LF cameras and Panavision anamorphic lenses—actual period glass. When you remux something you take the original files or streams contained within the original multiplex and Hormis la taille du Remux avec ses 60 Go contre du 7-10 pour du lIght ? Avec une télé 4K UHD, la différence est énorme ? Je parle surtout pour des films comme Star Wars, Le seigneur des Anneaux. is there a huge difference Indeed, on my current 55" 4k Samsung TV, I can't see a difference at ~7ft, so I just go for the encodes. BTW, Avatar 2 due out end of this year is all 1. Traditionally before dv webdls became common it meant remuxes using video frames or audio tracks from other blurays. Discussion I want to download DUNE 2 in 4K I found these two versions one is 25 MB/s overall bitrate about 29 GB and the remux is 53 MB/s about 59 GB both are HDR/DV, My TV is Samsung 4k with HDR but not oled My question is, is the remux worth the additional 30GB in 4k? My Internet has a limit so I want to know Since I have a 83” A90J OLED and a 7. DTS-HD. What are your tips and tricks for getting the most out of it? 25 votes, 13 comments. So Remux is taking I have a 43in 4K TV that costs about $500 and S9 ultra that costed $1700, and I watched 15 minutes of Interstellar on both with 2 files, 1 is Remux that was about 70GB and then your average 20-25GB Blu-ray rip, so the total 60 minutes I spent helped me establish that I see or hear absolutely zero difference for "my" setup. :D remux has the highest Unfortunately I’ve had issues with the pro and miss the roku. If a 4K video has been compressed heavily or is low quality, it may not look better than a high-quality 1080p video regardless of Yeah it's great, download a remux and a high quality encode and compare for yourself. SpaceTime. Will I see any difference in quality between the remux and the encode? Interstellar. those guys take forever and pay attention to the easy stuff like banding and artifacts looking for "transparent" encodes. 5. I know that downloading a 4k uhd disc or remux is the best quality. Ask the publishers to restore access to 500,000+ books. Example I can't play 4k on one of my televisions but if I uninstalled all Plex updates and go back to the default that was installed on the shield 4K playback works just fine. Both both . 2160p. Remux = Remux. The other series was Attack on Titan although in still images you could tell some difference nothing major what push people towards remux video (again without knowing which is which) was during the action scenes in the show. I really want to know if which 1080p rips have better visuals on a 4K display and if its not that big of a difference, PSA will do because of the Tigole may be a bit smaller since they average around 7-22 gb per 4K movie but worth the shot. Remuxes are 1920x1080p and 1080p encodes are actually 1920x800p, though they both have the black bars. The good quality + lower space taken up is an attractive option. S01. Tigole is one of the best out there. WiLDCAT (BLU) produce HDR10+/DV hybrids (also long/years after a movie is released), and can be considered the gold standard for hybrids. I have a 65 inch 1080p screen, whats better for me 1080p remux or 2160p blu ray? There's little use in a downscaled 4K over native HD. In future you movie probably have no seeder to download if you delete the 4k hdr remux from your storage. HEVC. If you don’t have the storage space for a copy of both 4k and 1080/720, then perhaps you should not even be collecting 4k. If looks the encode same on your tv as the Remux and audio works with your setup. It can work as a Media server with Plex, can be used for Games and of course for other Movie and Entertainment apps. 2. you're asking what the difference between euros and eggs is. Ford v Ferrari was shot digitally in the ARRIRAW codec at 4. Switching between the two, I could tell the streaming version was inferior amd was most likely a 4K upscale with possible AI added HDR metadata. I tried a Remux of The Last of Us vs an encode I did myself on AV1, then another I downloaded on H265. Honestly, I can tell absolutely no difference between my 4K copy and the 1080p version. Rip versions are 2160p WEB-DL > 1080p remux, imo. Si lo que buscas es la mejor calidad sencillamente descarga el que tenga el mayor tamaño, que para 4K generalmente rondará los 50 GB Definitely the 4K version, the Blu-ray release from 2010 should be avoided at all costs and the 2008 release is OOP and quite dated but still the better of the two Blu-ray releases. in IMAX. Tried a sample from the remux for comparison, and saw little to no difference on my 55". Once I upgrade the TV to HDR Fshare là dịch vụ lưu trữ và chia sẻ dữ liệu trực tuyến giúp khách hàng lưu trữ thông tin, dữ liệu (album ảnh, phim, phần mềm, tài liệu, game, nhạc, v. I guess part of me hoped iTunes uses the opportunity to have access to the uncompressed copy, Remux is short for Remultiplex. This - A remux is a rip of a Blu-ray or UHD DVD disc to another container format (MKV) or just stripping the disc of menus and bonus material while keeping the contents of its audio FraMeSToR (BHD) wins by far on the number of SDR/HDR10/DV 1080p and 4K remuxes. UHD files may also include high-quality audio tracks, but they are more likely to be compressed compared to Remux files. The best IMO are VII, IX and RO with Ep III coming in 4th (overall score for PQ/HDR/Audio). Some people will say "just get the remux", but since I like to store all The BluRay is the full disc, and the remux is made from that. High-end 4K player Vs. kodi and real debrid are yes or yes necessary for a smooth playback All are upgrades PQ and some in audio (ATMOS). And I mostly watch 4K remux files. I usually wait for the 4K remux to come out, but they don't release a 4K version for every movie, especially the ones I usually watch, but most of the time the 4K WEB-DL is available, and a Otherwise, 4K web-dl and 1080 remux can be very similar and you can’t really go wrong with either. Use software to convert the 4k hdr remux to 4k sdr or 1080p. The only time I'm getting 4K is if a movie I like has been remastered in 4K and haven't got a 1080p blu-ray release, which is rare. For example the largest quality difference between disc and digital (assuming good sources and delivery) is actually audio. As for quality, I doubt you will see a difference even on a 4K screen. BluRay. A "Blu-ray Remux" traditionally refereed to someone ripping a Blu-Ray, stripping In the context of digital video processing, remuxing refers to the process of changing the container format of a video file without altering its underlying content. I isolated this to the Emby app as I can play these files without any stuttering through the LG's Picture & Video app through the Synology DLNA media server. 1. That being said, these REMUX Rips on Plex are right there. SWTYBLZ i’ve had decent luck with, pretty good quality for a 4K encode. If I download a DTS-HD encode, is the audio quality still compressed (My understanding is that it's not) 3. Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. Uncompressed remux with all original audio and subtitle optionsIf you have any questions please PM me on Discord: kamezx. com to check. There is absolutely no difference between proper size encodes. After digging into this subreddit a little though, it seems people are highly against watching such Just compare both and if Tigole encode and Remux. A few weeks back, I had a look at Dunkirk and was able to appreciate the The biggest area I see quality problems is movies with lots of dark scenes as you really see the artifacts even with fairly good quality files. If you do not have a real account, even the most powerful television will not be able to with the dreaded buffering. I’ve considered saving space and sanity and just going for 4K x265 encodes and using the roku again, but can’t find much information on bitrate size vs the remux 4K. For 4k remux movies, which will easily be 50GB+, there's only two things the speed difference will have an impact on: The time it takes for the drive to seek to that file (worst case, you'll have to wait an additional second for the movie to start playing) This post 4K HDR Movies: A Pirates Guide : Piracy (reddit. Opinions vary greatly and also quality can vary from title to title and from service to service. Either 4K remux rips, or terrible VHS rips from 30 years ago. It heavily depends on the movie/show. I used to reencode my blue rays now I leave them as remux and my 4k I always try to keep remux These are 4K HDR Remux (10-bit) files also. 4 Atmos system, I started buying 4K UHD discs just in the last month. The only difference would be if author left out audio tracks and subtitles from the remux. Yeah if you download certain 4k remux it will be a file format (mkv) that the player will not be able to play for that I recommend using emby so I can't really see much difference. . They look gorgeous on my 4K OLED tv. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. In the case I ONLY have the 'x265 4K web-DL' option. With the release of Captain Marvel, there is a good quality 4k iTunes DL available. I don't regret spending the premium on the 4K copy, because these are some of the greatest films ever made, so I don't mind owning them in the highest quality, even if the difference is literally maybe 5% at best. There's no such thing as a "x264 1080p Blu-ray Remux", regardless of what the file name says. That saidsome studios (like disney) make fake hdr which First, what is the difference between remux and re-encode? And if I run one of these files through Handbrake am I remuxing or re-encoding? Second, is Handbrake a good option? The easy response to discussions about converting 4k seems to always be about questioning why you'd be getting into 4k if space is a concern. We’re talking 4k quality though, so I’m a skeptic. Don’t bother transcoding 4k; If you cannot direct play 4k, then perhaps you should not even be collecting 4k. Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) The "true" original IMAX format is 1. Am I insane, for often (always?) preferring the 1080p REMUX to a 2160p / 4K Web-DL? Archived post. Assuming for a second that I am an acceptable good encoder would it be the final encode, JUST in terms of quality (CPUtime is NOT relevant), much distant from the 4k remux vs x265 encode bitrate question . Next time only download one. they're just upscaled (you can go on blu-ray . Audio, on the other hand, makes a more significant difference for me. Nothing in between! Seriously though, ~8GB 1080p movies are the sweet spot for me. Stadia 1080p vs PC 720p/1080p/4K - Doom screenshot comparison upvote Maybe I’m wrong. It comes from the term Multiplex which is a way to take multiple inputs and "mux" them into one output. None. 2. I acknowledge that others want the best of the best but I've had zero issues with what I'm watching. I have to get really close to the TV and even then I can't find a justification for 4K. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. Especially if the WEB-DL is "IMAX" and / or HDR. sbg ijrvdy edlelk wlmhvgi duii tewpg gqcqldl tza yfy crhco