Furmark scores reddit Voltage untouched. Modern cards limit themselves when Furmark is being run, so overclocking won't do anything. We have seen previously that the RX 9070 XT does stack against the RTX 4080 quite well and this was also shown in a recent FurMark score that revealed the RX 9070 XT's A place for everything about the NVIDIA 3070 GPU! Come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. holy crap (i got no reference tho since i havent oc'ed 40 series myself) but afaik occt uses furmark as the basis for its gpu stresstest as well and it threw errors (in the range of 10-100) on my gpu stock, in the low 1000s at +800-900memclock and several 10000errors over +1000 (and over 1000+ i see scores dropping) and my gpu has been running stable with a light undervolt/oc and +900mem clock However, it seems that the Furmark benchmark, which is known for its heavy workload, is not being recognized as a demanding application by the GPU. C. Nobody uses Furmark as a benchmark for performance. I would say TIMESPY, which is free to download, is the closest or gives a bit more of a realistic point of view. The overclock is stable and tested in a couple of games, furmark, and benchmarks. Furmark + Cinebench scores for AMD R5 3600 + XFX 6600xt Benchmark Score Spent a few hours the other day tweaking my old OC in hopes of dropping temps a bit without losing much. 3080 gpu getting low scores in furmark compared to other 3080 cards, what could be the issue? Been playing with this for a year now but this is the first time i tried any benchmark. Cpu is 5700G, PBO'd to 4. P. When I run FurMark I only get a score of 6120, when I see 1070s and 1080s getting like 7500? What is going on? Why are my scores so low? If I overclock the GPU at all, it becomes unstable and crashes, even if I overclock by 20mhz. But idk if 1000points make any major difference in game fps. This subreddit is for build questions and graphics cards. 65ghz TimeSpy Extreme: 13. I'm incredibly confused. com. Looking at the averages, I was off by around 5000…the gpu compute was very low at around 14500 where the average is about 18000, and my directx12 was 35 as opposed to the 74 average. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Other than those two the other scores were average. Furmark isn't really good for benchmarking or testing stability because it draws an unrealistically high amount of current at a given voltage-frequency pair, likely slamming you up against a power or thermal wall well before any other limit. Use to have 1080ti, and now 3070. More recently, GPU drivers have introduced mitigations against Furmark, which prevent it from overheating / overloading GPUs. top) My system specs are as follows AMD Ryzen 5 5500 AMD 6650 xt DDR5 32gb Ram PSU is a 600w goldrated Is there any way i can see if my cards just not getting power, or some diagnostic tool? No I did not. Try 3DMark. If you have a question about the best card… We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Here's my FURMARK test with the 6650xt FurMark Scores (gpuscore. Junction doesn't go past 90C, I see clock speeds reach 2950MHz during benchmarks, fans don't go past 2000 RPM even with Furmark stress testing at 100% for an hour, power draw seems normal. My G2D score was also about 1300 where the average was about 1200. I just ran it with the AMD adrenalin app set to auto overclock, the target wat 2626MHz. GPU works fine and overall score isnt bad, can be little better with faster cpu. It would if its connected in the same pcie lane as the 4090, it depends on the motherboard design. But your benchmark finished successfully, so it's good. Furmark isnt the ideal choice for checking clockspeed I think. Not sure why my GPU scores are so bad. But it stayed at 2450-2500MHz. I would suggest using TimeSpy (demo) free on Steam, there you get a score and can easily compare it to others with similar setup/GPU as you, FurMark is only good for checking max power draw if even that It's because modern graphics card have safety measures in place to limit furmark performance. I enabled it now and ran it again. 30K subscribers in the graphicscard community. . Got an Timespy score of 14516 (what is lower than the previous one) but my GPU score is higher at 18534 and CPU score is also a touch higher at 6514 with D. Useful links: GPU Magick | FurMark FurMark (GL) OpenGL: P1440: 13550. Consequently, the card's boost clock might not be kicking in, resulting in lower performance scores. enabled. So, I have a MSI Duke 1080 Ti, factory overclocked to 1880mhz, a Ryzen 5 3600, and 16GB of DDR4 ram. 3K GPU Score on this card, roughly around 800 away from the 4080 FE in Paul's Hardware review and Jayz2cents video, and 600 above the 7900XT My old 2070 has died and im looking for a new gpu, i saw a 3060ti (asus dual) with a score of around 5900, is it a good score? Settings: P1440, Furmark GL, 60000msec Share Add a Comment Was looking at average scores (I believe) and some reddit posts as well, which yes of course they could be overclocking, have liquid cooling, etc. It's mainly used exclusively as a GPU stress test to simulate maximum (above real-world) loads. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. If you want to check if your score is normal, simply check a review article. top) Now here's someone elses score to compare FurMark Scores (gpuscore. 5k R23 score with just PBO enabled. The Furmark test run was the 1440 preset with a resolution of 2560x1440. Discover discussions, news… FurMark2 benchmark scores database - OpenGL - Vulkan. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. Therefore, your result is pretty much incomparable. Furmark stresses cards more than they're designed to be stressed, which can damage the card because of the heat output. Difference comes from cpu score, so i think cpu is bottlenecking little. As the other said, your power supply won't impact your scores. Both 1080p and 1440p seem low. 3dmark or Heaven, and compare with others scores Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size 212K subscribers in the GamingLaptops community. Feb 26, 2025 · Image Credit: reddit. I hear you on the paying for software bit. Furmark isn't a great GPU benchmark, in that its usual purpose is to heat-load a GPU to check if cooling is adequate (it's been dubbed a "power virus" by many). It can't be a CPU bottleneck - I've got a 5950x with a 28. I found out that 3080's where going toe to toe and sometimes even surpassing my 3090, there were even 3080TI's that destroyed my 3090 in score value. It's been a standard for a long time now (Heaven) and although I feel its loading is a bit to light to be a single point of validation in conjunction with Some breif Furmark you can for the most part cover your bases on GPU. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090/PCIe/SSE2 I recently bought a new Zotac Trinity 3090 on November 2022, a few months later I decided to run a Furmark stress tests on 1440P and 1080P and compare my scores with other GPU's with similar settings. Didnt notice before but graphics score is quite same as mine. Some of these benchmarks aren't accurate. While running Furmark the total wattage of my monitored-wattage devices went from 80-ish to 430W (plus or minus). Not only that, but Furmark only stresses the GPU, and therefore wouldn't expose any potential bottlenecks in the system. The CPU temperature as displayed by my motherboard's QLED numeric display remained quite low - 40-ish at most when idle is 30-ish (with a room temperature of 20C (68F)). Furmark is decent for benchmarking cooling solutions as it guarantees maximum power, however. I had a similar issue where my motherboard used the GPU pcie lane when I had my NVME and sata hdd connected to it which I noticed after populating the GPU lane by seeing the os drive disconnecting and other times it worked fine, so I kept researching on my motherboards pcie lanes and seeing which A place for everything about the NVIDIA 3070 GPU! Come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. Edit: Just ran Furmark at 1920x1080 temperature same framerate got up to 240ish, score went to 14179. Stock fan curve. O. There are a lot of good freeware options to be sure like the aforementioned. Yes, 120-130 fps is what you would expect in most modern games with a 3070 at 1440p, depending on title of course. Just did 3d Mark Timespy as well and got 18,153 for the score (19,556 for Graphics and 12,908 for CPU) with GPU temp max at 57, memory junction max at 80, and hot spot max at 77. Since Furmark is a GPU tester for that benchmark, not a CPU tester, the temperature for the GPU was 64C, FPS 160-ish, "score" 9500-ish (whatever "score" means). A bad power supply would make the computer crash/shutdown during an intense load though. whibo ullr dafv xou onojvyx kcb jpkknoa aidw vmdxj nhxdl zzt yjngz rdojne rfjjby essuby