Under editor evaluation for 2 weeks. Aug 11, 2024 · 11 August 2024.

Has anyone else experienced such a situation before? Dec 7, 2021 · This can mean that the Editor in Chief is deliberating over who should review your file. In my case, after the change for the 'under editor evaluation' status, it took lass than 1 week to receive the e-mail from the editor with the reviewer's recommendations. 6 original SEM images are grouped and converted into one figure, each labeled with letters a, b, c, etc. Sonographic screening for growth restriction after 28 weeks is also recommended. Then recently it switched to "Under Editor Evaluation", and a week after that, it now says "Decision in Progress". Does this mean the paper has been rejected? May 12, 2016 · My paper’s status has been ‘editor invited’ for 2 weeks, but today the status date changed although the status still shows ‘editor invited. One feature of the new approach was that once all the reviews had been received, the editor and the reviewers collaborated with each other to write an “Evaluation summary” that summarised the main points of the reviews in plain language for the benefit of readers. Also, I received no response was to my inquiry. Reviewer: Submitting reviewer comments within a reasonable timeframe, typically around 2 weeks unless an extension is requested. ” It is quite normal for journals to take 2-3 weeks or even more to assign a paper to an editor. After that, it was changed to “Under Editor Evaluation”. It is likely that the submission is currently waiting for the Section Editor’s decision on the manuscript’s chance of further revision. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal in the field of Applied Statistics. Jan 12, 2017 · The status "under editor evaluation" indicates that the paper is now with the Associate Editor (AE) who will evaluate it based on the reviews and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected, or revised. If a paper is selected for peer review, the Editor will either send the paper to suitable reviewers or assign an Associate Editor to act on their behalf. On the whole, the process was quite slow. So, you could wait for some time – at the most, until mid-January, when the holiday season ends – before writing to the @Student "Decision in Progress" might take 2 weeks maybe? If it takes longer than that you can email the journal to ask. Articles can be sent to multiple prospective reviewers before the required number are secured. . I then submitted a very nice email to the editor two weeks ago indicating I would be more than happy to make further revisions. Journal Staff Jun 5, 2015 · [41, 42] Therefore, ACOG recommends antepartum testing starting at 32 weeks of gestation for women with prior stillbirth, or 1-2 weeks earlier than the previous stillbirth, in an otherwise healthy mother. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. Hi. After one week, the status changed to Under Review. However, some people said it is slow. I understand that you have submitted your manuscript over a month ago and the status hasn't been updated. Its thanksgiving week. Has anyone experienced this? Does that mean a rejection is usually the result in this Thank you very much for the answer. I had e-mailed the journal manager enquiring about the "with editor " status. g. I would recommend sending another reminder after 2 weeks requesting the process to be expedited. However, it took 6 weeks before the status changed to "Under editor evaluation" directly. Did the editor ask for another referee? Yes Thanks. What does this status (“Under Editor Evaluation”) common? Is it likely to be rejected? And what is the difference equipped “Decision in Process”? Please let me know. When the status changes to "Under editor evaluation" after "Under review," it means that peer review for the paper is now done and the editor is going through the reviews and the paper to arrive at a decision. I had sent a paper to a non-ISI journal. After three months of 'Under review', the status changed to 'Required review completed' a week ago, then it became 'With editor'. After one and half months it backs again to the first step i. Due to the fact that many profit oriented companies are not ready to pay the costs of publication download for their co-workers and (sadly) many governements just want good results form the the Editor who decides whether it is suitable for sending out for peer review. May 8, 2021 · 'Under review' could refer to either review by the desk editor of the journal or peer review by a reviewer. After resubmitting the revision, the editor sent it to the 3 of them. , the basics. What done this status (“Under Editor Evaluation”) mean? Is a likely to be rejected? And what is to difference with “Decision in Process”? Please lets me see. This puts the theoretical turnaround at 18-21 weeks (around 5 moths). It is now slightly more than 8 months and the status has changed to "editor invited. sc website. To avoid rejection due to mismatch with the journal's scope and readership, send pre-submission inquiries to a few journals at the same time. 15 days is nothing in academic time, especially with a global pandemic going on. Two weeks have been passed but still the status is required reviews completed. Nov 30, 2019 · I am assuming you submitted it on 22 nd November, and a week has passed since the status changed to “Submitted to Journal. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. On Jan 5, it turned again to 'Decision in Process' and now it is still stuck at this stage for nearly 2 weeks. We had submitted our paper and got three relatively positive reviews, [only] one reviewer asking for a few additional experiments. Editor’s Decision in Progress: A change in status from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ may signify that the editor has successfully gathered all the necessary reviews from the assigned reviewers. After a while, I got a notification that my manuscript was being handled by a particular AE. Nov 6, 2023 · 6 November 2023. In most cases, if under Editor evaluation remains for 3-5 days, it means that Editor is not able to make a decision immediately based on reviewers comments. Aug 9, 2023 · 2-Nov-21 Submited 3-Nov-21 Under evaluation 8-Nov-21 Under evaluation 8-Nov-21 Invited editor 8-Nov-21 Under evaluation 20-Nov-21 Under evaluation 24-Nov-21 To Review (Midway changed to "To Review" 21 times) 28-Jan-22 To Review 3-Feb-22 Rejected 23-Feb-22 Appealed 2-Mar-22 To Revision 10-Apr-22 Due date extension 10-May-22 Due date extension Dec 2, 2017 · My paper was submitted about 3 months ago and it went through the whole progress from (i) "With Editor" to (ii) "Under Review" for about 2. ’ I guess they couldn’t find suitable editor now. However, what you can hope for is that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision on the manuscript, sees things differently Nov 7, 2017 · The decision was delayed, so I sent a reminder in the middle of October. 1 of them required a major revision. According to Elsevier statistics, this journal takes 5 weeks for the first decision. If your application has been under evaluation for a month, what does it mean? One interpretation is that… Well, it could mean one thing… It could simply mean that the company never got around to reviewing your application. If you cannot meet the deadline you are given for returning a complete review let the editor and staff know as soon as possible. May 16, 2023 · For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Mar 28, 2020 · Note that statuses, as well as status changes, can be different for different journals. Related reading: Behind the scenes: A journal editor's insight into what happens post manuscript submission Aug 6, 2022 · I have submitted my research article to Environment, Development and Sustainability (Springer) 3 weeks ago. Dec 18, 2017 · This could explain the delay of 4 months. Cite. It’s been 3 months and the status is showing "Submitted" ever since. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my Jul 31, 2018 · It is a reputed journal, and after 2 months of submission I got ‘Major revisions’. The status "under editor evaluation" indicates that the paper is now with the Associate Editor (AE) who will evaluate it based on the reviews and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected, or revised. Aug 12, 2024 · 29 June 2024. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned 14 Performance Evaluation Introduction. ’ However, it has now changed to ‘To review’ again. Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 0 Generic (CC BY 2. Mar 2, 2016 · When at least 2 or 3 reviewers reports (this count is configured by the journal) are not come till then status won't change. Finally it's rejected after 3 weeks and they offered the transfer to SA. now, it is over 32 days but we have not received the first decision neither an acceptance or rejection. I have sent 3 different mails to the editor inquiring when I can expect it to be under review but I did not get any response. It means that the peer review is over, taking about two months, and the peer reviewer recommendations are awaited on the paper. Then, (after two weeks) it takes "Editor invited". Dear Editor Subject: about instruction for authors- “original images requirements” section in “plants” journal . Content in this chapter is available from Organizational Behavior and the Organizational Justice Wikipedia page. As you’ve already written to the editor once, you needn’t write to them again for, say, two weeks. Just very anxious!! Nov 20, 2018 · First of all, you have to wait for the minimum time to take final decision (that is generally 10-12 weeks for Elsevier). Oct 29, 2015 · Recently, I have submitted my manuscript to a peer reviewed journal (Wiley). Either: The editor has already received the necessary reviews, and is taking a decision (perhaps taking another look at your paper) May 10, 2021 · Thank you for this question. It has been almost two weeks since the status is showing under consideration. Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. Dec 8, 2016 · I submitted a manuscript in an Elsevier Diary. Please do not worry since it has only been a week and the journal is responsive to your queries. It then changes to under editor evaluation May 11, 2017 · Thus, the best you can do is look for a journal that will give the first decision within 3-4 weeks. The dashboard status is showing that the paper is under review but the editor has given the decision on dated 25. Jan 18, 2016 · The status changed to 'Under review' for 3 weeks and then turned to 'Under Editor Evaluation' around Christmas. As has this position (“Under Editor Evaluation”) mean? Your it likely to be rejected? And what a the difference with “Decision are Process”? Please let me know. Now with under editor evaluation. Aim to Appear Objective before giving an Evaluation Argument. ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ Select Download Format Under Editor Evaluation Means Download Under Editor Evaluation Means PDF Download Under Editor Evaluation Means DOC ᅠ House will use to evaluation means that can sell and feedback from writers group, a service variables for Mar 19, 2020 · Answer: For most journals, ‘With Editor’ means that the manuscript is with the associate editor (AE), who is going through it to check for aspects such as the scope match, novelty of the study, quality of the writing, and adherence to the journal’s submission guidelines. Science now gives the opportunity for cross My manuscript status shows "With Editor" after initial submission. However, I made all the suggested changes and resubmitted the paper on August 11. In the end, this status is a good thing. Feb 28, 2017 · In general, the entire process from submission to first decision can take 6-8 months. What usually makes significant delays are reviewers not returning reviews on time and authors not providing revisions on time. Would that be because he wants another positive or another negative report? Look at it this way. , Jun 12, 2020 · I submitted an academic paper that was accepted with revisions over a month ago. " Ideally, the status "Evaluating recommendation" should not take more than a few weeks. during first submission I had: under review -> under editor evaluation -> Revision Requested This time, after R&R: under review -> decision in process Sep 26, 2021 · Hello. Three months after submission, the status changed to "under review" and then remains the same since then. Figure 1: Performance meeting, in this photo the manager (right) delivers the man in the suit’s (left) one-on-one performance evaluation (Credit: home thods/ flickr/ Attribution 2. Jun 8, 2023 · Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. ” The status was last updated on September 16. May 11, 2018 · @TheDoctor: We may not know what happened exactly, but we may make an educated guess. hello, I am expereincing a delay. This is the first time that a journal already spent two weeks until now to evaluate the paper for suitability before assigning it to the editor. Any papers by any subset of the authors that are related to the manuscript and are under consideration or in press at other journals. The Action Editor (i. The "Editor invited" status stayed for two weeks, and then it changed to "Decision in Process" directly. Was your RR after a 1. Here is an interesting read. Reviewers are contacted before being sent a paper and are asked to return comments within 2 weeks for most papers. For in-depth review, at least two outside referees are consulted. Was that right? Mar 8, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to [---]. 5 months. but if your paper is not accepted, you will have to submit it to another journal. The editor (or editorial office) has to check the submission to make sure it complies with all ethical guidelines (e. After another 2 days, an email was sent to me which said that the manuscript will be handled by an assistant editor and 2 days later, another email was sent to me saying “your manuscript will be handled by a subject editor. Hi good day, I have submitted my article in energies (energies-3092655) on dated 21. Initial Evaluation 2–3 DAYS 1-2 WEEKS 2-3 WEEKS 3-4 DAYS Process → Assess the manuscript within 2-3 working days using: o Information provided by staff editors in the Editorial Manager discussion o Your own subject area expertise o The PLOS Biology publication criteria (more info on this below) Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal in the field of Applied Statistics. We would suggest that you wait for another week before writing to the journal for an update. Peer Review in Progress. This is because the editor probably has a few papers already lined up before yours. You should write to the journal every 2 weeks asking about the progress. It's been 2 weeks since, but the status is still showing "Editorial assessment. May 31, 2018 · Answer: Please do not worry about the manuscript’s review process. Sep 26, 2020 · After two days of being 'Under Review,' the status of my manuscript changed to 'Under Editor Evaluation,' and has remained so for a week. I have seen it recently. The status changed to "under review" for a few months. The school promised to evaluate the student, and Mr. Jul 10, 2016 · Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. I am confused whether it would be too early to contact the editor about the status of the paper. Ideally, I second a month max as a timeframe for the entire review process and two to three weeks for peers to review manuscripts of interest. Worst thing that can happen is that the question remains unanswered. Weekly biophysical profile or fetal heart rate testing can May 29, 2020 · Answer: You seem quite clued in to the journal submission and review process, which is a good thing. So more than 1 month is definitely atypical, and you should write in and ask. I sent a message to the handling editor via the online system asking for an update. I have not heard back though. 2 Weeks after getting my manuscript number. The second is to use an evaluation criteria. Your evaluation will eventually need an argument. I think it's best to wait for some more time (at least two more weeks) before writing to them requesting an update. Just very anxious!! Sep 16, 2021 · Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal Nov 9, 2022 · In some organizations, the application procedure takes two weeks, while in others, it takes several months. Since past 4 days the status is ‘pending editor decision’. After three months, the status on the website was ‘Required Reviews Completed’. If the editor had enough negative reports, the paper would have already been rejected. It is not uncommon for reviewers to have differing opinions and it is up to the Editor to make a final decision on your manuscript based on the reviewers’ opinions and the revisions you have made. Dec 4, 2018 · I submitted a Statistics Methods paper to a decent journal operated by Taylor & Francis (using the Scholar One system). If this is the case, then the handling editor might refer the manuscript to another editor/editorial board of the journal for a final decision regarding the submission. When I contacted the journal (the journal does not allow direct emailing to the editor), I got a reply from the journal office stating that ‘2 referees have sent Nov 1, 2017 · About 2 months have passed since I submitted my paper to the Journal of Cellular Physiology. It seems strange. We will Feb 22, 2019 · Wait for a couple of weeks more and if you still don't see any change in status, send a polite email to the editorial office asking by when you can expect the manuscript to be assigned to an editor. You should have actually submitted your paper earlier. It depends on the journal. Comment. After 3 weeks, the status changed from “With Editor” to “Decision in Process”. After that, it was changed on “Under Editor Evaluation”. The state has been “under review” for 2 weeks. What does this status (“Under Editor Evaluation”) mean? Is it likely to be rejected? And what is the difference with “Decision in Process”? Please let me know. Williams consented to the evaluation before the end of September. At this stage, the editor is diligently analysing the feedback, weighing the merits and shortcomings of the manuscript, and Jun 12, 2020 · However, a week since the status change and two weeks since submission isn’t a long time. May 3, 2018 · Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. , & Smits, J The manuscript status changed from under evaluation, to advisor and under evaluation in the first week. Once this is done and the paper is with the Editor-in-Chief, the status will most likely change to "Decision in process. My question is that, is it normal if a manuscript remains "Under editor evaluation" for such a long period of time? If not, should I contact to the journal? Or should I just be patient and wait? Thanks in Jun 18, 2018 · But some times it means your manuscript is under evaluation by reviewers. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience Jul 19, 2018 · Two weeks later, the paper went to the Associate Editor (AE) for his/her recommendations, and then to the Editor in Chief or Section Editor (SE). 2024. What does "Under editor evaluation" mean? Does it mean that all reports were received by the editor and now s/he has to decide? Yes Jan 30, 2018 · Hello! I have submitted my manuscript to a journal via the online submission system. Of course, they may be facing some challenges assigning an editor, but that could be an internal matter. This does not mean that he has received all the reviews he is expecting, some reviewers are invited or accept their invitations later than others (sometimes 2-3 weeks 約2週間のunder review期間を経過した後にUnder Editor Evaluationというstatusになりました。 Under Editor r S p o n d o e s t r f 3 h h h c h 8 l h M 1 t f L g a n 4 l e 2 m 7 a f a 0 o a f h e 9 t r 5 0 c 8 9 3 1 a f 5 t 8 May 4, 2023 · On average, the length of time it takes an editor to process a paper submitted to their journal and send it out for peer review is 2-3 weeks. The status became “under review” 2 days after submission, and it remains unchanged till date. Here, I assume the status changed directly from ‘Editor Assigned’ to ‘Under Editor Evaluation. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Jun 25, 2019 · However, if the editor is not satisfied with the review, he/she may send your manuscript for an additional review. Samuel Tawiah Baidoo. I am from the mathematics background. Jun 26, 2020 · If you search on this site, you'll find people whose papers have been under review for more than a year. You don’t worry about change date with same status. At Scientific Reports, we focus on ensuring that all papers we publish are of high technical quality, and let the scientific community determine the impact of your work. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Sep 27, 2019 · Answer: I understand that you twice revised and resubmitted your paper twice. If they come then status may change to "with editor" or "under editor evaluation" or "required reviews completed". The editor may be able to make a decision after the additional review is complete. They promised that the review process will be expedited as it's unusual for a manuscript to have a "with editor" status for two weeks. Soon after submission, the paper is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening to see if the paper meets the basic requirements of the journal in terms of subject matter, scope Aug 14, 2017 · The status changed to “Under review” in 10 days and again changed to “Reviews received” within another 2 weeks. Now, the status has changed to ‘Under Editor Evaluation. Oct 20, 2022 · Last year eLife changed its editorial process to focus on the peer review of preprints. I shouldn't have checked. You should wait for at least 2-3 weeks. After three months, it changed to Revise, but I'm not aware of its type, [whether] major or minor. Two days later, I checked the status and found that it had changed to Under Review. Another month What if it has been "Under editor evaluation" for several months? Should I be worried? My paper's status changed from "Under review" to "under editor evaluation" at an Elsevier Journal (JME). 2024 as mentioned below Sep 26, 2017 · The journal I submitted to has rather short review time. I can't . Since the status of your paper changed to "under review" half a day after being "with editor," I'm inclined to think that "under review" in this case refers to the initial editorial screening. What does this mean? May 12, 2016 · My paper’s status has been ‘editor invited’ for 2 weeks, but today the status date changed although the status still shows ‘editor invited. Manuscript statuses can oscillate back and forth between ‘Required Review Completed’ and ‘Under Review’ before a final decision is made by the editor. May 7, 2019 · He/she will give his her recommendation about the decision to the Editor-in-Chief who will take the final call. Aug 11, 2024 · 11 August 2024. Do you recommend that I should email the editor about when I should expect the reviews to be completed? Or should I wait another month given that Statistics/Mathematics journals may take longer than The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. The status changed from "Submitted to the journal" to "With Editor" after 3 days. Share. Reviewers may be selected to evaluate particular components of a manuscript that draw on their individual expertise. It seems like the editor skipped the "Under review" process which seems very weird to me. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. , declarations, data protection, local and national ethical board approvals) as well Dec 13, 2018 · I submitted a manuscript on 2 April 2018. There are two secrets to writing a strong evaluation essay. Once he/she is done with those, you will surely see a status change. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Oct 24, 2020 · Answer: This is quite simple. Normally “editor invited” comes after manuscript screening. He replied: Your paper is still under review. 2 Recommendations. 10 days have passed since then, but I haven't yet been informed of the decision. In this case, 1) should I consider that the editor-in-chief couldn’t find a suitable person to review my paper? 2) And from what I know, to get a first response from journal it takes 30 to 35 Jan 22, 2015 · After two weeks of required reviews completed status I have sent and E-mail to the editor. We would recommend waiting for at least 2-3 more weeks. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. Jul 5, 2021 · It could be that the journal wasn’t able to find suitable peer reviewers for your paper, and the handling editor is evaluating the manuscript to decide on a suitable way forward. Jun 12, 2019 · Behind the scenes: A journal editor's insight into what happens post manuscript submission; How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor; You will also find these posts useful: Why is the status of my submitted manuscript showing "reviewer invited" for 2 weeks? Jul 23, 2021 · I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. When I contacted the journal (the journal does not allow direct emailing to the editor), I got a reply from the journal office stating that ‘2 referees have sent For most articles, a minimum of two reviews are required. While tracking the status I found it has not been sent to reviewers. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who needs to make the final decision based on the initial decision by the associate editor (AE), might also be busy with other journal responsibilities. Jan 8, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it was ‘Under Review’ for 20 days. I made the revisions, but have not heard back from the editor. I'd suggest to wait until at least their stated average time before you ask for an update. Mar 9, 2017 · To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev. By 14 days, the status had now been changed to "Decision in Process". So, the reviewers will share their comments with the Associate Editor (AE) along with their recommendations for the paper – whether (or not) they believe the paper has merit and should therefore be considered (or not) for publication. 2 of them strongly disagree considering the novelty. Does this mean that my revised manuscript was evaluated by the editor instead of being sent to a reviewer? Initially, both were under review for some time as usual. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Does it mean my manuscript has a chance to be sent for peer review? Can you just throw some light on the process? I am very new to research and this happens to be my first paper. Jul 9, 2019 · Check out this question. As I understood, rejection could be fast and easy. Any idea about this situation? Does this mean the SE and EIC are making the final decision or they need another reviewer to look at the manuscript? Peer-review Feb 11, 2023 · This change in the status indicates either of the two scenarios: 1) the journal editor needs to identify a new reviewer for the review process because the original reviewer(s) may have declined to review for reasons including but not limited to potential conflict of interest and differences in verdict, 2) the journal editor needs to address the Dec 22, 2016 · A change of status from "with editor" to "under editor evaluation" probably means that your paper is now going through the initial editorial check. The status changed to With Editor on September 5, then directly changed to Decision in Process on September 8, and has Our editorial process. Hence I should expect a rejection right? Really sorry for this. What does it mean? Is it going to get rejected? Jul 22, 2013 · Editor evaluation 3 weeks. Any manuscript you access to review is a privileged and confidential Nov 2, 2016 · The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. Most journals take about 6-8 weeks to respond with a decision and the reason for these differing peer review periods could vary. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. Feb 1, 2021 · Firstly, we understand you mean ‘withdraw’ and not ‘retract. After fininshing the revisions, I sent the manuscript which is in the status' Editor Assigned' for over 3 weeks. With Editor -> Under Review -> Required reviews completed -> (usually changed in a week or two to) Decision in Process (this usually lasted a few days to two weeks) But at the moment, for the first time: With Editor -> Under Review (4 months) -> Under Editor Evaluation and has been so for the last 2 months. The status "Under Editor Evaluation" is quite usual and it generally means the reports from the peer reviewers have been received and the Editor of the journal is assessing the reports, prior to making the final decision on the submitted manuscript. Oct 8, 2021 · I've recently submitted a manuscript to a reputable journal. Nov 24, 2021 · After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". It has been exactly three months now and the status says "Under Review". The status has been “under review” for 2 weeks. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". The status of one paper then has tuned to "under editor evaluation" about which I am still clueless. Maintain confidentiality. May 10, 2021 · The time taken for review under this process can vary amongst journals as it depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of editors and the extent of revisions recommended. Does this mean a rejection? In September, two weeks after the new school year began, his 16 year-old son told him that he was having a hard time hearing his teacher and, as a result, he is unable to take detailed notes during class lectures. After your email, the editor could have reassigned the review to a senior editor to expedite the process. It has now Sep 10, 2023 · 2. Huisman, J. I sent an inquiry to the journal and they replied that “we are asking the editor about the status. 5 month under review? Mine changed from with editor to under review in 2 weeks, stayed as under review for 1 month and 6 days to be exact. ’ ‘Withdrawing’ is done by the researcher at any stage before the acceptance of the paper, usually because the journal review is taking very long. Once it will May 25, 2020 · So, technically, it has been 15 days. Our Jun 6, 2021 · Usually when I send a manuscript to a journal, in about 1 or 2 days, the status changes to "with editor" and after a maximum of 3 weeks the status changes to "with referee". ’ Jan 18, 2020 · Based on these factors, the AE will decide whether or not to send the manuscript for peer review. the Editor or Associate Editor who is handling your Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Like. Feb 10, 2018 · My paper has been submitted to a journal 2 months ago. The first is to aim for objective analysis before forming an opinion. " This status has been showing for almost two weeks now. These changes can be nerve-wracking for authors, but they are an inherent part of the thorough and meticulous evaluation that manuscripts undergo. However, i can see on the portal the duration for submission to first decision is shown as 28 days. It took five days for getting the "Editor assigned" status after my submission and still Science Advances asks that most reviews be returned within two weeks, although editors sometimes extend the deadline. ’ If so, ‘Editor Assigned’ means that an associate editor (AE) was assigned to the manuscript. :-) So, yes, such a quick movement from ‘With Editor’ to ‘Decision in Process’ usually means it might be a desk reject. It took one year to complete the review process. — we are able to edit the answer for that question and introduce the possibility of this situation happening – the canonical question exists to cover a regular workflow, i. What should I do? My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. Get does this standing (“Under Editor Evaluation”) mean? Is it likely to been rejected? And what is the difference with “Decision in Process”? Please let me know. Till date, the status is "With editor". Dec 8, 2016 · I submitted a scripture to an Elsevier Journal. I am a bit worried now. usually an editor takes two weeks for making any decision. I am anxious about how the editor is thinking. This applies throughout the evaluation process at Science. ” One week later, the status Jun 18, 2018 · You will not know at which state is your manuscript. If for more than two weeks the status does not change, it is under review. Aspects studied are duration of the first review round, total review duration, immediate rejection time, the number, quality, and difficulty of referee reports, the time it takes authors to revise and resubmit their May 10, 2018 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal hosted by Elsevier and after four days, the status changed to "With editor". Dec 8, 2016 · I submission a manuscript to an Elsevier Journal. Dec 11, 2019 · As editors have several manuscripts in the queue and as the holiday season is approaching, your paper may remain ‘Under Editor Evaluation’ for a while. As it has been only about two weeks since submission and given that AEs have many manuscripts – at many different stages of submission and review – to go through, you could expect to wait for a few weeks for the AE’s decision on your submission. Also, I sent an inquiry after 1 month of submission and received the reply that it takes 2-4 months to review a manuscript and if accepted, it will be available online in The status "under editor evaluation" indicates that the paper is with the Associate Editor (AE) who will evaluate it based on the reviews and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected Dec 8, 2016 · IODIN submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier Journal. and put it in the manuscript as Figure 1. If a related paper is submitted elsewhere while the Science paper is under consideration, please contact your editor. How to write an Evaluation Essay. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. e. "Under editor evaluation" means the editor - not the reviewers - is the one with something to do. I enquired once around 4 months after submission. The status went to "Under Review" in about 3 days after submission. After sending our revised manuscript to the editor, the status changed to ‘To review’ and then to ‘Under evaluation. The status is been “under review” for 2 wks. Possible reasons for this could be that the reviewers have conflicting views or one or two reviews might be weak or unsatisfactory. We need 1 or 2 more review comments and make the decision within a month. After 3 weeks of being "Under review," the status changed to "Under editor evaluation" and it is still showing the same status for 28 days. However, one week later, I got a notification that my manuscript was now being handled by another AE because the first AE was not able to finalize the peer review process. The editorial office replied in 5 days that the recommendation was just issued by the handling editor responsible for my paper, but the decision by the Editor-in-chief was in process. However, the AE's decision is not final: he/she can only give a recommendation to the Editor-in-chief (EiC) in this matter. 2 – 3 First editorial decision May 19, 2016 · I submitted my paper to Springer journal more than a month ago. Feb 28, 2022 · I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. So, you will need to wait for some more days, say, the end of this week, to see a status change. Typically, however, identifying and communicating with peer reviewers does take more than a day, and many journals do subject manuscripts to some internal review based on which appropriate peer reviewers are identified. Does that mean that editor has to invite new reviewers? Jul 30, 2019 · I have submitted a paper to one of the Elsevier journals. You can send an email to the journal to ask for an update. Related resources. You're at the "Editorial Decision" stage, and as you can see from there, the typical duration is a few workdays to a week. This makes me nervous as it may indicate the editors decided that the manuscript did not meet their standards. 06. Sep 15, 2021 · Hi, My manuscript is under the 3rd round of review, with R1 acceptance and R2 revision in the 2nd round. I have ever heard that in general, the decision and notification is prompt if the result is rejection. 4. If the status still does not change, you can send an email to the Editor-in-chief asking for an update. " Mar 5, 2017 · This status "With Associate Editor" means that the associate editor who is in charge of your manuscript has received the minimum number of reviews (usually 2) for your paper. 0) Motivation: After about 2 months evaluation, the manuscript was sent to 6 reviewers, 3 of them agreed that this work is of great importance and should be published with some revision. However, this status remained unchanged for the next 1. 約2週間のunder review期間を経過した後にUnder Editor Evaluationというstatusになりました。Under Editor All reactions: 5. It is too early to write to the editor about this. And then the status of the other one was changed to "under editor evaluation", which has turned to Reject eventually :( The other one has been pending as "Decision in process". Jun 20, 2017 · It is quite normal for the status to remain unchanged in this stage for a week or two. Why was there no "with editor" status and why did it change to "Decision in Process"? Nov 13, 2017 · The status has not changed from “With Editor” since 2 months after submission. The journal replied that they were having difficulty in finding reviewers and they would let me know when there is an update. Dec 18, 2022 · Grettings, I submitted a manuscript to a Springer Journal and after Under Reviewing I got some minor revisions. – Status turned again to "Under Review" after a week at "Under editor evaluation". I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal 5 weeks ago. I don't think you can do much at this stage to hasten the process apart from sending reminders to the editor from time to time. As most of the comments were acceptable, I made sufficient revisions. I submitted a paper on September 7, 2017, and only the date was updated twice (maybe the editor edited) but the status did not change from “With Editor. Just wait 6 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod also exists for JDE. Also, it has been only about three weeks since this status change. After that, it was changed to “Under Owner Evaluation”. Oct 11, 2020 · Hi. In this case, 1) should I consider that the editor-in-chief couldn’t find a suitable person to review my paper? 2) And from what I know, to get a first response from journal it takes 30 to 35 Dec 8, 2016 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier Journal. Oct 1, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal. Editor: Initial evaluation to ensure the paper is ready for review, securing reviewers with relevant expertise and processing a decision on the paper. okzr bctlsim xqlj ffe tsq nmjs bqnjx koqh ftozp vgxqg